Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 5.15 857/917] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section | Date | Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:05:52 +0100 |
| |
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
commit 3e067fd8503d6205aa0c1c8f48f6b209c592d19c upstream.
When UBSAN is enabled, the code emitted for the call to guest_pv_has includes a call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value. objtool complains that this call happens with UACCESS enabled; to avoid the warning, pull the calls to user_access_begin into both arms of the "if" statement, after the check for guest_pv_has.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -3227,9 +3227,6 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm } st = (struct kvm_steal_time __user *)ghc->hva; - if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st))) - return; - /* * Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid * expensive IPIs. @@ -3238,6 +3235,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm u8 st_preempted = 0; int err = -EFAULT; + if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st))) + return; + asm volatile("1: xchgb %0, %2\n" "xor %1, %1\n" "2:\n" @@ -3260,6 +3260,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st))) goto dirty; } else { + if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st))) + return; + unsafe_put_user(0, &st->preempted, out); vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0; }
| |