lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf arm-spe: Support hardware-based PID tracing
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:28:48PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:

[...]

> > +static void arm_spe_set_pid_tid_cpu(struct arm_spe *spe,
> > + struct auxtrace_queue *queue)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_spe_queue *speq = queue->priv;
> > + pid_t tid;
> > +
> > + tid = machine__get_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu);
> > + if (tid != -1) {
> > + speq->tid = tid;
> > + thread__zput(speq->thread);
> > + } else
> > + speq->tid = queue->tid;
> > +
> > + if ((!speq->thread) && (speq->tid != -1)) {
> > + speq->thread = machine__find_thread(spe->machine, -1,
> > + speq->tid);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (speq->thread) {
> > + speq->pid = speq->thread->pid_;
> > + if (queue->cpu == -1)
> > + speq->cpu = speq->thread->cpu;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int arm_spe_set_tid(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, pid_t tid)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe;
> > + int err = machine__set_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu, tid, tid);
>
> I think we should pass -1 as pid as we don't know the real pid.

AFAICT, I observe one case for machine__set_current_tid() returning error
is 'speq->cpu' is -1 (this is the case for per-thread tracing). In
this case, if pass '-1' for pid/tid, it still will return failure.

So here should return the error as it is. Am I missing anything?

Thanks,
Leo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-11 08:43    [W:0.059 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site