Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:47:16 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex |
| |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:46:01PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2021-11-11 13:37, schrieb Mark Brown:
> > If you are sending a new version of something please flag that in the > > commit message, this helps both people and automated systems identify > > that this is a new version of the same thing.
> Are RFC patches eligible to be picked up? I wasn't sure if I had to > resend it at all. But since there was a mistake in the commit message > anyway, I went ahead and the the first "real" version. How would > you flag that? Isn't changing the subject from "[PATCH RFC]" (ok it > was "RFC PATCH", my bad) to "[PATCH]" enough?
No, both people and machines are going to get confused. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |