lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 3/3] dynamic_debug: Add a flag for dynamic event tracing
----- On Nov 9, 2021, at 5:28 PM, rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:

> [ Hmm, should add Mathieu in on this discussion ]
>
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:13:13 -0500
> Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> wrote:
>
>> > What we are looking at there is to pass the dynamic debug descriptor to the
>> > trace event filtering logic, where you could filter on information passed
>> > to it. For example, on a specific file if a trace event is called by
>> > several different files or modules.
>> >
>> > -- Steve
>>
>> Ok, Could this be done at the dynamic debug level as it can already match
>> on specific files and line numbers currently?
>
> Not sure what you mean by that.
>
> The idea was that this would only be enabled if dynamic debug is enabled
> and that the DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA() could be used at the
> tracepoint function location (trace_foo()) by the tracepoint macros. And
> then if one of the callbacks registered for the tracepoint had a
> "dynamic_debug" flag set, it would be passed the descriptor in as a pointer.
>
> And then, for example, the filtering logic of ftrace could then reference
> the information of the event, if the user passed in something special.
>
> # echo 'DEBUG_FILE ~ "drivers/soc/qcom/*"' > events/rwmmio/rwmmio_write/filter
> # echo 1 > events/rwmmio/rwmmio_write/enable
>
> And then only the rwmmio_write events that came from the qcom directory
> would be printed.
>
> We would create special event fields like "DEBUG_FILE", "DEBUG_FUNC",
> "DEBUG_MOD", "DEBUG_LINE", etc, that could be used if dyndebug is enabled
> in the kernel.
>
> Of course this is going to bloat the kernel as it will create a dynamic
> debug descriptor at every tracepoint location.

I think there is indeed value in doing this. Where I'm not sure is regarding
how we allow this to be enabled/configured.

The way I see it, it might be sufficient and simpler to do just something along
those lines:

- Introduce a new struct tracepoint_caller_info, which would contain information
about file, line number and module name where each trace_*() statement is located.
- Add a new CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_CALLER_INFO which generates this new structure at
build time for kernel and modules. This would indeed bloat the kernel, but it's
a build-time configurable trade-off.
- Change the prototype for the tracepoint callbacks to add an additional argument
"struct tracepoint_caller_info *caller_info". When CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_CALLER_INFO
is disabled, simply have this pointer be NULL. When CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_CALLER_INFO
is enabled, pass the tracepoint's caller_info structure as parameter.

It should be straightforward to adapt the tracepoint callback prototypes within each
user within the Linux kernel tree. And for out-of-tree users, they have to adapt to
that kind of change already anyway.

Thoughts ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-11 14:25    [W:0.222 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site