lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] jump_label: refine placement of static_keys
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:35 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:09:06PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >
> > With CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y, "struct static_key" content is only
> > used for the control path.
> >
> > Marking them __read_mostly is only needed when CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n.
> > Otherwise we place them out of the way to increase data locality.
> >
> > This patch adds __static_key to centralize this new policy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/jump_label.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> > kernel/events/core.c | 2 +-
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> > net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++----
> > net/netfilter/core.c | 2 +-
> > net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 2 +-
> > 8 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Hurmph, it's a bit cumbersome to always have to add this __static_key
> attribute to every definition, and in fact you seem to have missed some.

Sure, I can make sure to include all cases. I was hoping
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE()/DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE()
would catch the majority of uses.

We also can add a new DEFINE_STATIC_KEY() macro to ease these cases.



>
> Would something like:
>
> typedef struct static_key __static_key static_key_t;
>
> work? I forever seem to forget the exact things you can make a typedef
> do :/

I tried, but a typedef was not working. A macro would work.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-10 16:31    [W:0.118 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site