Messages in this thread | | | From | Guo Ren <> | Date | Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:34:06 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked |
| |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:47 PM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:17:36 +0800 > guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > Hi Guo Ren, > > Thank you for your patch. > > May be it should be applied to stable ? Yes, I would Cc stable next.
> > Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the > > driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq > > is blocked by hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq > > source which has been disabled in enable register. The bug was > > firstly reported in [1]. > > > > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]: > > > > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by > > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the > > claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the > > completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If > > the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is > > currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ > > completion is silently ignored. > > > > [1] > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html > > [2] > > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc > > > > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Cc: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> > > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> > > Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes since V6: > > - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin > > - Remove thead related codes > > > > Changes since V5: > > - Move back to mask/unmask > > - Fixup the problem in eoi callback > > - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE > > - Rewrite comment log > > > > Changes since V4: > > - Update comment by Anup > > > > Changes since V3: > > - Rename "c9xx" to "c900" > > - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference > > > > Changes since V2: > > - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic" > > - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point > > irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask > > - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the > > differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx > > PLIC. > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef > > 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d) > > { > > struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers); > > > > - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) { > > + plic_irq_unmask(d); > > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + plic_irq_mask(d); > > + } else { > > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + } > > } > > > > static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { >
-- Best Regards Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
| |