lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next v2] bpf/benchs: Fix return value check of bpf_program__attach()
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:35 AM Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> If bpf_program__attach() fails, it never returns NULL,
> we should use libbpf_get_error() to check the return value.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---
> v2:
> don't use 'int err'
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> index 6eeeed2913e6..4afaa4adb327 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static void bloom_lookup_setup(void)
> populate_maps();
>
> link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_lookup);
> - if (!link) {
> + if (libbpf_get_error(link)) {

Please use ASSERT_OK_PTR() instead.
See how other tests are doing it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-01 23:01    [W:0.057 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site