lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema
From
Date
On 05/10/2021 15:14, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Merging/dependencies
>>> ====================
>>> 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
>>> fixes), because of context.
>>> 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.
>>>
>>> The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
>>> tree. For example regulator or mfd tree. I propose the regulator tree,
>>> since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
>>
>> Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
>
> I tend to take cross subsystem patches. MFD is usually in the centre
> of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable
> branches/pull-requests.
>
> Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.
>

Another alternative is that regulator patches (1-2, 4-6) go via Mark who
later gives you a stable branch/tag to pull. Then the clock and MFD
bindings would go on top via MFD tree.

There is a comment from Rob which I will fix in v3.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-06 14:56    [W:0.039 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site