Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:44:01 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v20 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support | From | Palmer Dabbelt <> |
| |
On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:22:36 PDT (-0700), anup@brainfault.org wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:31 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 01:58:28 PDT (-0700), pbonzini@redhat.com wrote: >> > On 27/09/21 13:39, Anup Patel wrote: >> >> This series adds initial KVM RISC-V support. Currently, we are able to boot >> >> Linux on RV64/RV32 Guest with multiple VCPUs. >> >> >> >> Key aspects of KVM RISC-V added by this series are: >> >> 1. No RISC-V specific KVM IOCTL >> >> 2. Loadable KVM RISC-V module supported >> >> 3. Minimal possible KVM world-switch which touches only GPRs and few CSRs >> >> 4. Both RV64 and RV32 host supported >> >> 5. Full Guest/VM switch is done via vcpu_get/vcpu_put infrastructure >> >> 6. KVM ONE_REG interface for VCPU register access from user-space >> >> 7. PLIC emulation is done in user-space >> >> 8. Timer and IPI emuation is done in-kernel >> >> 9. Both Sv39x4 and Sv48x4 supported for RV64 host >> >> 10. MMU notifiers supported >> >> 11. Generic dirtylog supported >> >> 12. FP lazy save/restore supported >> >> 13. SBI v0.1 emulation for KVM Guest available >> >> 14. Forward unhandled SBI calls to KVM userspace >> >> 15. Hugepage support for Guest/VM >> >> 16. IOEVENTFD support for Vhost >> >> >> >> Here's a brief TODO list which we will work upon after this series: >> >> 1. KVM unit test support >> >> 2. KVM selftest support >> >> 3. SBI v0.3 emulation in-kernel >> >> 4. In-kernel PMU virtualization >> >> 5. In-kernel AIA irqchip support >> >> 6. Nested virtualizaiton >> >> 7. ..... and more ..... >> > >> > Looks good, I prepared a tag "for-riscv" at >> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git. Palmer can pull it and >> > you can use it to send me a pull request. >> >> Thanks. I'm assuming "you" there is Anup? >> >> Just to make sure we're on the same page here, I've got >> >> commit 6c341a285912ddb2894ef793a58ad4f8462f26f4 (HEAD -> for-next) >> Merge: 08da1608a1ca 3f2401f47d29 >> Author: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> >> Date: Mon Oct 4 10:12:44 2021 -0700 >> >> Merge tag 'for-riscv' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git into for-next >> >> H extension definitions, shared by the KVM and RISC-V trees. >> >> * tag 'for-riscv' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (301 commits) >> RISC-V: Add hypervisor extension related CSR defines >> KVM: selftests: Ensure all migrations are performed when test is affined >> KVM: x86: Swap order of CPUID entry "index" vs. "significant flag" checks >> ptp: Fix ptp_kvm_getcrosststamp issue for x86 ptp_kvm >> x86/kvmclock: Move this_cpu_pvti into kvmclock.h >> KVM: s390: Function documentation fixes >> selftests: KVM: Don't clobber XMM register when read >> KVM: VMX: Fix a TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR field mask issue >> selftests: KVM: Explicitly use movq to read xmm registers >> selftests: KVM: Call ucall_init when setting up in rseq_test >> KVM: Remove tlbs_dirty >> KVM: X86: Synchronize the shadow pagetable before link it >> KVM: X86: Fix missed remote tlb flush in rmap_write_protect() >> KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy virt_ext from vmcb12 >> KVM: x86: nSVM: test eax for 4K alignment for GP errata workaround >> KVM: x86: selftests: test simultaneous uses of V_IRQ from L1 and L0 >> KVM: x86: nSVM: restore int_vector in svm_clear_vintr >> kvm: x86: Add AMD PMU MSRs to msrs_to_save_all[] >> KVM: x86: nVMX: re-evaluate emulation_required on nested VM exit >> KVM: x86: nVMX: don't fail nested VM entry on invalid guest state if !from_vmentry >> ... >> >> into ssh://git@gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git for-next >> (I know that's kind of a confusing name, but it's what I've been using >> as my short-term staging branch so I can do all my tests before saying >> "it's on for-next"). >> >> If that looks OK I can make it a touch more official by putting into the >> RISC-V tree. >> >> > I look forward to the test support. :) Would be nice to have selftest >> > support already in 5.16, since there are a few arch-independent >> > selftests that cover the hairy parts of the MMU. >> >> Me too ;). >> >> I'm happy to add some KVM-related stuff to my pre-push test set, just >> LMK if there's anything specific I should be looking in to. > > Thanks Palmer, I will ping you once I have basic kvm-selftest patches > ready for RISC-V.
Sonuds good. I was just rewriting history (oops) because I forgot a SOB, so the hash is a bit different but it the merge is still the tip of palmer/for-next.
73698660f17c Merge tag 'for-riscv' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git into for-next
| |