lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memory: mtk-smi: Fix a null dereference for the ostd
From
Date
On 28/10/2021 07:50, Yong Wu wrote:
> We add the ostd setting for mt8195. It introduces a abort for the
> previous SoC which doesn't have ostd setting. This is the log:
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0000000000000080
> ...
> pc : mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0x64/0x130
> lr : mtk_smi_larb_resume+0x54/0x98
> ...
> Call trace:
> mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0x64/0x130
> pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x48
> __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0xa8
> genpd_runtime_resume+0x94/0x2c8
> __rpm_callback+0x44/0x150
> rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
> rpm_resume+0x310/0x558
> __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x88
>
> In the code: larbostd = larb->larb_gen->ostd[larb->larbid],
> if "larb->larb_gen->ostd" is null, the "larbostd" is the offset, it is
> also a valid value, thus, use the larb->larb_gen->ostd as the condition
> inside the "for" loop.

You need to write more clearly, what you are fixing here.

>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Could you help review and conside this as a fix for the mt8195 patchset?
> The mt8195 patchset are not in mainline, thus, I don't know its sha-id,
> and don't add Fixes tag.
> Thanks
> ---
> drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..0262a59a2d6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general(struct device *dev)
> if (MTK_SMI_CAPS(flags_general, MTK_SMI_FLAG_SW_FLAG))
> writel_relaxed(SMI_LARB_SW_FLAG_1, larb->base + SMI_LARB_SW_FLAG);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < SMI_LARB_PORT_NR_MAX && larbostd && !!larbostd[i]; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < SMI_LARB_PORT_NR_MAX && larb->larb_gen->ostd && !!larbostd[i]; i++)
> writel_relaxed(larbostd[i], larb->base + SMI_LARB_OSTDL_PORTx(i));

The code does not look good. You have already a dereference at line 244:

const u8 *larbostd = larb->larb_gen->ostd[larb->larbid];

You are not fixing the NULL pointer dereference.

>
> for_each_set_bit(i, (unsigned long *)larb->mmu, 32) {
>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-29 19:36    [W:0.103 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site