Messages in this thread | | | From | <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for sc7280 WPSS PIL loading | Date | Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:51:49 +0530 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 3:32 AM > To: agross@kernel.org; bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; > mathieu.poirier@linaro.org; ohad@wizery.com; p.zabel@pengutronix.de; > pillair@codeaurora.org; robh+dt@kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; sibis@codeaurora.org; mpubbise@codeaurora.org; > kuabhs@chromium.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for sc7280 WPSS PIL loading > > Quoting pillair@codeaurora.org (2021-10-28 06:08:39) > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > > > Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:05 AM > > > To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>; agross@kernel.org; > > > bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org; > > > ohad@wizery.com; p.zabel@pengutronix.de; robh+dt@kernel.org > > > Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; sibis@codeaurora.org; > > > mpubbise@codeaurora.org; kuabhs@chromium.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for sc7280 WPSS PIL loading > > > > > > Quoting Rakesh Pillai (2021-10-03 23:48:50) > > > > Add support for PIL loading of WPSS co-processor for SC7280 SOCs. > > > > > > > > Changes from v4/v5: > > > > - Add yaml conversion for adsp/cdsp dt-bindings > > > > - Change clock names in wpss dt-bindings > > > > - Correct mistake in signed-off enail ID > > > > > > Can you keep a running tally here of the full progression of the series? > > > That helps to look back and make sure we don't make a comment that > > > has already been made before. > > > > > > One more request. Can you add support for 'firmware-name' like there > > > is in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt so > > > that we can install firmware into some namespaced/versioned place > > > instead of having to put wpss files into /lib/firmware? > > > > Hi Stephen, > > I have posted v7 with the support for firmware-name to be provided in the > DT entry. > > Thanks. I didn't see it in my inbox. No Cc for me? > > > > > > It would also be nice to load a > > > single firmware file instead of having to split the file into many pieces. > > > > This would require lot of changes and lot of code duplication from request > firmware. > > Also the base ath11k firmware files have been posted as split files. > > > > Other firmwares have done it so it seems technically possible. So nothing is > preventing it?
Yes it should be possible. I can probably add that support and post it as a different patch series, so as to not club it with the current patch series. Does that sound okay ?
Thanks, Rakesh Pillai.
| |