Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 03/45] notifier: Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() | From | Dmitry Osipenko <> | Date | Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:32:37 +0300 |
| |
28.10.2021 14:00, Andy Shevchenko пишет: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:33AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return >> true if given handler has unique priority. > > ... > >> +/** >> + * atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique >> + * @nh: Pointer to head of the atomic notifier chain >> + * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check >> + * >> + * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority. >> + * Must be called in process context. >> + * >> + * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise. > > Why this indentation?
This is the same doc-comment style used by this file in general. I haven't tried to invent anything new.
> ... > >> + /* >> + * This code gets used during boot-up, when task switching is >> + * not yet working and interrupts must remain disabled. At > > One space is enough.
This comment is replicated multiple times over this source file. You can find it before each down_write(). I borrowed the text as-is, for consistency.
| |