lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH memcg v3 3/3] memcg: prohibit unconditional exceeding the limit of dying tasks
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:36:41 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:

> My view on stable backport is similar to the previous patch. If we want
> to have it there then let's wait for some time to see whether there are
> any fallouts as this patch depends on the PF_OOM change.

It's strange that [1/3] doesn't have cc:stable, but [2/3] and [3/3] do
not. What is the thinking here?

I expect we'd be OK with merging these into 5.16-rc1. This still gives
another couple of months in -rc to shake out any problems. But I
suspect the -stable maintainers will merge and release the patches
before they are released in 5.16.

In which case an alternative would be not to mark these patches
cc:stable and to somehow remember to ask the -stable maintainers to
merge them after 5.16 has been on the streets for a suitable period.

Greg, thoughts?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-28 00:37    [W:0.175 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site