lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix fclose/pclose mismatch
From
Date
On 10/26/21 8:34 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen().
>
> Fixes: 81f77fd0deeb ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index cc1cd240445d..e3fea6f281e4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
>
> if (getline(&line, &len, fp) == -1)
> goto err;
> - fclose(fp);
> + pclose(fp);
>
> if (len > size)
> len = size;
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
> free(line);
> return 0;
> err:
> - fclose(fp);
> + pclose(fp);
> return -1;
> }
>
>

Thank you for the patch. The return logic could be simpler
doing out handling common for error and success path with
just one call to close. Not related to this change though.

Adding bpf maintainers to the thread

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-26 19:49    [W:0.056 / U:2.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site