lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] media: rc: pwm-ir-tx: Switch to atomic PWM API
Hello,

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 07:33:47AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Assign variables directly and simplify conditional statement
> V2 -> V3: Fix declaration of undeclared variable
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> index 4bc28d2c9cc9..e1f348a962e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> @@ -53,22 +53,21 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> {
> struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
> struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_ir->pwm;
> - int i, duty, period;
> + struct pwm_state state;
> + int i;
> ktime_t edge;
> long delta;
>
> - period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * period, 100);
> + pwm_init_state(pwm, &state);
>
> - pwm_config(pwm, duty, period);
> + state.period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> + state.duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * state.period, 100);
>
> edge = ktime_get();
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - if (i % 2) // space
> - pwm_disable(pwm);
> - else
> - pwm_enable(pwm);
> + state.enabled = !(i % 2);
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
>
> edge = ktime_add_us(edge, txbuf[i]);
> delta = ktime_us_delta(edge, ktime_get());
> @@ -76,7 +75,8 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> usleep_range(delta, delta + 10);
> }
>
> - pwm_disable(pwm);
> + state.enabled = false;
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);

I would have added a struct pwm_state to struct pwm_ir and then would
call pwm_init_state() only once in .probe(). But that's subjective if
you like it better or not, so do what you prefer.

The other changes look fine, so:

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-25 08:09    [W:0.058 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site