Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:24:39 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix implicit type conversion |
| |
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:00:00AM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:57:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> The variable 'n' is defined as ULONG. However in the cpumask_next(), > >> it is used as INT. > >> That is vulnerable and may cause overflow. > >> Therefore, it might be better to define 'n' as INT. > > >-ENOPARSE > > I don't understand the 'ENOPARSE'. > Please give me more details.
I've no idea what your changelog is trying to say, or how your patch makes a difference.
| |