lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: qce: Add 'sm8150-qce' compatible string check
On Sun 24 Oct 12:59 CDT 2021, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 22:48, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 13 Oct 11:58 CDT 2021, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > Add 'sm8150-qce' compatible string check in qce crypto
> > > driver as we add support for sm8150 crypto device in the
> > > device-tree in the subsequent patch.
> > >
> > > Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > > index 4c55eceb4e7f..ecbe9f7c6c0a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > > @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static int qce_crypto_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > static const struct of_device_id qce_crypto_of_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qce", },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qce", },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-qce", },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-qce", },
> >
> > When I look at linux-next I see qce_crypto_of_match defined as:
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id qce_crypto_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "qcom,crypto-v5.1", },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,crypto-v5.4", },
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > Can you please help me understand what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Oh, you have missed [PATCH 15/20] from the sm8250 qce crypto addition
> series (see [1])
>
> This series is dependent on the sm8250 qce enablement series, as I
> noted in the cover letter (see [2]).
>

Ah, now I see. Thanks for the pointer!

> However, Thara and Vladimir pointed out backward compatibility issues
> with PATCH 15/20 of the first series. So I will send a v5 to fix the
> same along with other issues pointed in the v4.
>
> Sorry for any confusion caused.
>

No worries. Could you include these two patches in v5 of the other
series, to clarify the dependency?

Thanks,
Bjorn

> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211013105541.68045-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/T/#m566546d32d8da7ee94822dfba625e98fd3496d17
> [2]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg96053.html
>
> Regards,
> Bhupesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-25 01:19    [W:0.069 / U:2.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site