lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add venus DT node
From
Date
Hi Dikshita,

On 9/22/21 1:15 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 20 Sep 23:50 CDT 2021, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>
>> Add DT entries for the sc7280 venus encoder/decoder.
>>
>> this patch depends on [1].
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=529463

Please drop those two lines above.

>
> The stuff you write here will be forever imprinted in the git history
> and it's already unnecessary, given that the patch you reference here is
> available in linux-next.
>
> Things you want to mention, but shouldn't go into the git history, put
> those below the '---' line.
>
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@codeaurora.org>

I guess this should be :

Co-developed-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@codeaurora.org>

but checkpatch --strict should complain about this, no?

>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index a8c274a..f171ababc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@
>> no-map;
>> reg = <0x0 0x80b00000 0x0 0x100000>;
>> };
>> +
>> + video_mem: memory@8b200000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8b200000 0x0 0x500000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> cpus {
>> @@ -1063,6 +1068,76 @@
>> qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>> };
>>
>> + venus: video-codec@aa00000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-venus";
>
> I do however now see this compatible defined in a binding in linux-next,
> so you definitely should have listed that patch as a dependency - and
> preferably held off sending me 6 versions (plus resend) of a patch that
> I can't merge.
>
> Please ping me once the binding is merged, so that I know when I can
> merge this patch.
Bjorn, the binding is in linux-next now.

--
--
regards,
Stan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-22 10:31    [W:0.051 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site