Messages in this thread | | | From | Uladzislau Rezki <> | Date | Wed, 20 Oct 2021 17:00:28 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC 2/3] mm/vmalloc: add support for __GFP_NOFAIL |
| |
> > On Wed 20-10-21 16:29:14, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 4:06 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote: > [...] > > > As I've said I am OK with either of the two. Do you or anybody have any > > > preference? Without any explicit event to wake up for neither of the two > > > is more than just an optimistic retry. > > > > > From power perspective it is better to have a delay, so i tend to say > > that delay is better. > > I am a terrible random number generator. Can you give me a number > please? > Well, we can start from one jiffy so it is one timer tick: schedule_timeout(1)
-- Uladzislau Rezki
| |