lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules
From
Date
On 10/1/21 8:31 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Let's say, I want to make a simple printk change to drivers/pci/bus.c,
> compile it, load it, test it.
>
> Now, since bus.o is built as a result of CONFIG_PCI=y in
> drivers/pci/Makefile, so this module is statically built, and as a
> result doing a "make M=drivers/pci" does-not-pick-up-the-change /
> have-any-effect.
>
> Doing a simple "make" takes too long, everytime for even a trivial change.
>
>
> So, what is the recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules?
>
>
> Will be grateful for pointers.

Just to build drivers/pci/bus.o, you do
$ make drivers/pci/bus.o

That will tell you if you have any build errors/warnings.

For run-time testing, AFAIK you don't have any choice but to
build a full kernel and boot it.

--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-02 06:34    [W:0.032 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site