lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: skip current when memcg reclaim
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 10:28:54 +0800 Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:00 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:15:29 +0800 Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> > >
> > > Sibling thread of the same process could refault the reclaimed pages
> > > in the same time, which would be typical in None global reclaim and
> > > introduce thrashing.
> >
> > "None" -> "node", I assume?
> >
> > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > @@ -2841,6 +2841,11 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> > > sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > + /*
> > > + * Don't bother current when its memcg is below low
> > > + */
> >
> > The comment explains what the code is doing, but the code itself
> > already does this. Please can we have a comment that explains *why*
> > the code is doing this?
> We find that the patch help direct reclaiming bail out early and
> eliminate page thrashing for some scenarios(etc APP start on android).
> The case could be worse if each APP possess a unique memcg(pages on
> current's lru are reclaimed more than global reclaim)

What I meant was: please redo the patch with a comment which explains
"why the code does this", rather than "what the code does".

Also, as this is a performance enhancement, it is preferred to have
some performance testing results in the changelog.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-16 04:59    [W:0.059 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site