lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] user_events: Enable user processes to create and write to trace events
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:21:32AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:25:23 -0700
> Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 06:22:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > > I'm not sure this point, you mean 1 fd == 1 event model?
> > > > >
> > > > Yeah, I like the idea of not having an fd per event.
> > >
> > > Ah, OK. I misunderstood the idea.
> > > per-FD model sounds like having events/user-events/*/marker file.
> > >
> > 2.
> > We have a anon_inode FD that gets installed into the user process and
> > returned via the ioctl from user_events tracefs file. The file struct
> > backing the FD is shared by all user mode processes for that event. Like
> > having an inject/marker file per-event in the user_events subsystem.
>
> Is it safe to share the same file structure among all processes?
> (sharing FD via ipc may do same thing?)
>
I believe so, perf_event_open syscall uses this approach. I think
sharing among processes would only be a problem if the file_operations
methods assumed some synchronization. I don't see how this would be
different than a fork inheriting a pre-existing FD.
> > > > I want to make
> > > > sure the complexity is worth it. Is the overhead of an FD per event in
> > > > user space too much?
> > >
> > > It depends on the use case, how much events you wants to use with
> > > the user-events. If there are hundreds of the evets, that will consume
> > > kernel resources and /proc/*/fd/ will be filled with the event's fds.
> > > But if there is a few events, I think no problem.
> > >
> > In our own use case this will be low due to the way we plan to use the
> > events. However, I am not sure others will follow that :)
>
> I just concerned if qemu consider to use this interface for their event
> log :)
>
Yep, agree. It sounds like taking an index'd approach as you first
suggested is worth the complexity. I want to make sure you and Steven
agree before attempting.

Thanks,
-Beau

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-13 18:56    [W:0.099 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site