Messages in this thread | | | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> | Date | Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:01:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: exynos: fix cpu unit name warnings |
| |
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 16:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > dtc started warning about some of the CPU addresses: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:78.20-83.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000000: unit name should not have leading 0s > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:85.20-90.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000100: unit name should not have leading 0s > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:92.20-97.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000200: unit name should not have leading 0s > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:99.20-104.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000300: unit name should not have leading 0s > > Remove the leading zeroes. > > Fixes: f695b3f4c45d ("arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for exynosautov9 SoC") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > ---
Thanks Arnd, but this was fixed with the next version of patchset. It's my bad because I did not drop the patch from my next branch after spotting it, knowing that Chanho will resubmit the next day and then I would replace it. This replacement happened next day but linux next got the older/buggy patch.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |