lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add bluetooth node on SC7280
Hi Stephen Boyd,

On 2021-10-12 22:54, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Balakrishna Godavarthi (2021-10-12 06:01:38)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> index 272d5ca..09adc802 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> @@ -393,6 +393,23 @@
>> <&tlmm 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
>> pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> pinctrl-1 = <&qup_uart7_sleep_cts>, <&qup_uart7_sleep_rts>,
>> <&qup_uart7_sleep_tx>, <&qup_uart7_sleep_rx>;
>> +
>> + bluetooth: wcn6750-bt {
>
> bluetooth: bluetooth {
>
> Node names should be generic.
>

[Bala]: will update in next patch.

>> + compatible = "qcom,wcn6750-bt";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&bt_en_default>;
>> + enable-gpios = <&tlmm 85 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + swctrl-gpios = <&tlmm 86 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> Is there any pinctrl config for gpio 86?
>
[Bala]: This is input GPIO to apps, BT SOC will handle configurations.

>> + vddaon-supply = <&vreg_s7b_0p9>;
>> + vddbtcxmx-supply = <&vreg_s7b_0p9>;
>> + vddrfacmn-supply = <&vreg_s7b_0p9>;
>> + vddrfa0p8-supply = <&vreg_s7b_0p9>;
>> + vddrfa1p7-supply = <&vreg_s1b_1p8>;
>> + vddrfa1p2-supply = <&vreg_s8b_1p2>;
>> + vddrfa2p2-supply = <&vreg_s1c_2p2>;
>> + vddasd-supply = <&vreg_l11c_2p8>;
>> + max-speed = <3200000>;
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7280.dtsi */
>> @@ -504,6 +521,14 @@
>> */
>> bias-pull-up;
>> };
>> +
>> + bt_en_default: bt_en_default {
>
> bt_en: bt-en {
>
> Node names shouldn't have underscores and 'default' is redundant.
>
[Bala]: will update in next patch.

>> + pins = "gpio85";
>> + function = "gpio";
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + output-low;
>> + bias-pull-down;
>
> Why is there a pull down on an output gpio? Shouldn't this be
> bias-disable?
>

[Bala]: BT_EN pin is OP of apps and input to BT SoC.
by default we want the state of BT_EN to be low. so used pull down
instead of bias-disable
as AFAIK bias-disable may trigger a tristate on BT_EN pin, which may
trigger BT SoC enable
if it is not actually triggered.

>> + };
>> };
>>
>> &sdc1_on {

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-13 07:31    [W:1.732 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site