lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
From
Date
On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 21:08 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

This is not enough to make any changes because the commit message
does not describe what goes wrong if we keep it as it was.

/Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-12 17:22    [W:0.144 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site