Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Date | Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:21:57 +0300 |
| |
On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 21:08 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html, > SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for > other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3. > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
This is not enough to make any changes because the commit message does not describe what goes wrong if we keep it as it was.
/Jarkko
| |