lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] gup: document and work around "COW can break either way" issue
On Mon 11-10-21 18:52:44, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>
> commit 17839856fd588f4ab6b789f482ed3ffd7c403e1f upstream.
>
> Doing a "get_user_pages()" on a copy-on-write page for reading can be
> ambiguous: the page can be COW'ed at any time afterwards, and the
> direction of a COW event isn't defined.
>
> Yes, whoever writes to it will generally do the COW, but if the thread
> that did the get_user_pages() unmapped the page before the write (and
> that could happen due to memory pressure in addition to any outright
> action), the writer could also just take over the old page instead.
>
> End result: the get_user_pages() call might result in a page pointer
> that is no longer associated with the original VM, and is associated
> with - and controlled by - another VM having taken it over instead.
>
> So when doing a get_user_pages() on a COW mapping, the only really safe
> thing to do would be to break the COW when getting the page, even when
> only getting it for reading.
>
> At the same time, some users simply don't even care.
>
> For example, the perf code wants to look up the page not because it
> cares about the page, but because the code simply wants to look up the
> physical address of the access for informational purposes, and doesn't
> really care about races when a page might be unmapped and remapped
> elsewhere.
>
> This adds logic to force a COW event by setting FOLL_WRITE on any
> copy-on-write mapping when FOLL_GET (or FOLL_PIN) is used to get a page
> pointer as a result.
>
> The current semantics end up being:
>
> - __get_user_pages_fast(): no change. If you don't ask for a write,
> you won't break COW. You'd better know what you're doing.
>
> - get_user_pages_fast(): the fast-case "look it up in the page tables
> without anything getting mmap_sem" now refuses to follow a read-only
> page, since it might need COW breaking. Which happens in the slow
> path - the fast path doesn't know if the memory might be COW or not.
>
> - get_user_pages() (including the slow-path fallback for gup_fast()):
> for a COW mapping, turn on FOLL_WRITE for FOLL_GET/FOLL_PIN, with
> very similar semantics to FOLL_FORCE.
>
> If it turns out that we want finer granularity (ie "only break COW when
> it might actually matter" - things like the zero page are special and
> don't need to be broken) we might need to push these semantics deeper
> into the lookup fault path. So if people care enough, it's possible
> that we might end up adding a new internal FOLL_BREAK_COW flag to go
> with the internal FOLL_COW flag we already have for tracking "I had a
> COW".
>
> Alternatively, if it turns out that different callers might want to
> explicitly control the forced COW break behavior, we might even want to
> make such a flag visible to the users of get_user_pages() instead of
> using the above default semantics.
>
> But for now, this is mostly commentary on the issue (this commit message
> being a lot bigger than the patch, and that patch in turn is almost all
> comments), with that minimal "enable COW breaking early" logic using the
> existing FOLL_WRITE behavior.
>
> [ It might be worth noting that we've always had this ambiguity, and it
> could arguably be seen as a user-space issue.
>
> You only get private COW mappings that could break either way in
> situations where user space is doing cooperative things (ie fork()
> before an execve() etc), but it _is_ surprising and very subtle, and
> fork() is supposed to give you independent address spaces.
>
> So let's treat this as a kernel issue and make the semantics of
> get_user_pages() easier to understand. Note that obviously a true
> shared mapping will still get a page that can change under us, so this
> does _not_ mean that get_user_pages() somehow returns any "stable"
> page ]
>
> [surenb: backport notes
> Since gup_pgd_range does not exist, made appropriate changes on
> the the gup_huge_pgd, gup_huge_pd and gup_pud_range calls instead.
> Replaced (gup_flags | FOLL_WRITE) with write=1 in gup_huge_pgd,
> gup_huge_pd and gup_pud_range.
> Removed FOLL_PIN usage in should_force_cow_break since it's missing in
> the earlier kernels.]

I'd be really careful with backporting this to stable. There was a lot of
userspace breakage caused by this change if I remember right which needed
to be fixed up later. There is a nice summary at
https://lwn.net/Articles/849638/ and https://lwn.net/Articles/849876/ and
some problems are still being found...

Honza

>
> Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> [surenb: backport to 4.4 kernel]
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> mm/huge_memory.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 4c5857889e9d..c80cdc408228 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -59,13 +59,22 @@ static int follow_pfn_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> }
>
> /*
> - * FOLL_FORCE can write to even unwritable pte's, but only
> - * after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty.
> + * FOLL_FORCE or a forced COW break can write even to unwritable pte's,
> + * but only after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty.
> */
> static inline bool can_follow_write_pte(pte_t pte, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - return pte_write(pte) ||
> - ((flags & FOLL_FORCE) && (flags & FOLL_COW) && pte_dirty(pte));
> + return pte_write(pte) || ((flags & FOLL_COW) && pte_dirty(pte));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A (separate) COW fault might break the page the other way and
> + * get_user_pages() would return the page from what is now the wrong
> + * VM. So we need to force a COW break at GUP time even for reads.
> + */
> +static inline bool should_force_cow_break(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) && (flags & FOLL_GET);
> }
>
> static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> @@ -509,12 +518,18 @@ long __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> if (!vma || check_vma_flags(vma, gup_flags))
> return i ? : -EFAULT;
> if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
> + if (should_force_cow_break(vma, foll_flags))
> + foll_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> i = follow_hugetlb_page(mm, vma, pages, vmas,
> &start, &nr_pages, i,
> - gup_flags);
> + foll_flags);
> continue;
> }
> }
> +
> + if (should_force_cow_break(vma, foll_flags))
> + foll_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> +
> retry:
> /*
> * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting pages and
> @@ -1346,6 +1361,10 @@ static int gup_pud_range(pgd_t pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> /*
> * Like get_user_pages_fast() except it's IRQ-safe in that it won't fall back to
> * the regular GUP. It will only return non-negative values.
> + *
> + * Careful, careful! COW breaking can go either way, so a non-write
> + * access can get ambiguous page results. If you call this function without
> + * 'write' set, you'd better be sure that you're ok with that ambiguity.
> */
> int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> struct page **pages)
> @@ -1375,6 +1394,12 @@ int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> *
> * We do not adopt an rcu_read_lock(.) here as we also want to
> * block IPIs that come from THPs splitting.
> + *
> + * NOTE! We allow read-only gup_fast() here, but you'd better be
> + * careful about possible COW pages. You'll get _a_ COW page, but
> + * not necessarily the one you intended to get depending on what
> + * COW event happens after this. COW may break the page copy in a
> + * random direction.
> */
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> @@ -1385,15 +1410,22 @@ int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> if (pgd_none(pgd))
> break;
> + /*
> + * The FAST_GUP case requires FOLL_WRITE even for pure reads,
> + * because get_user_pages() may need to cause an early COW in
> + * order to avoid confusing the normal COW routines. So only
> + * targets that are already writable are safe to do by just
> + * looking at the page tables.
> + */
> if (unlikely(pgd_huge(pgd))) {
> - if (!gup_huge_pgd(pgd, pgdp, addr, next, write,
> + if (!gup_huge_pgd(pgd, pgdp, addr, next, 1,
> pages, &nr))
> break;
> } else if (unlikely(is_hugepd(__hugepd(pgd_val(pgd))))) {
> if (!gup_huge_pd(__hugepd(pgd_val(pgd)), addr,
> - PGDIR_SHIFT, next, write, pages, &nr))
> + PGDIR_SHIFT, next, 1, pages, &nr))
> break;
> - } else if (!gup_pud_range(pgd, addr, next, write, pages, &nr))
> + } else if (!gup_pud_range(pgd, addr, next, 1, pages, &nr))
> break;
> } while (pgdp++, addr = next, addr != end);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 6404e4fcb4ed..fae45c56e2ee 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1268,13 +1268,12 @@ out_unlock:
> }
>
> /*
> - * FOLL_FORCE can write to even unwritable pmd's, but only
> - * after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty.
> + * FOLL_FORCE or a forced COW break can write even to unwritable pmd's,
> + * but only after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty.
> */
> static inline bool can_follow_write_pmd(pmd_t pmd, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - return pmd_write(pmd) ||
> - ((flags & FOLL_FORCE) && (flags & FOLL_COW) && pmd_dirty(pmd));
> + return pmd_write(pmd) || ((flags & FOLL_COW) && pmd_dirty(pmd));
> }
>
> struct page *follow_trans_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> --
> 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-12 10:07    [W:0.090 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site