lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Perf and Hackbench results on my machine
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:33:02AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> Hello Vlastimil.
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:21:01AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 10/11/21 00:49, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's certain that an object will be not only read, but also
> > >> written after allocation.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Why is it certain? I think perhaps what you meant to say is that if we
> > > are doing any prefetching here, then access will benefit from prefetchw
> > > instead of prefetch. But it's not "certain" that allocated memory will be
> > > accessed at all.
> >
> > I think the primary reason there's a prefetch is freelist traversal. The
> > cacheline we prefetch will be read during the next allocation, so if we
> > expect there to be one soon, prefetch might help.
>
> I agree that.
>
> > That the freepointer is
> > part of object itself and thus the cache line will be probably accessed also
> > after the allocation, is secondary.
>
> Right. it depends on cache line size and whether first cache line of an
> object is frequently accessed or not.

Not first cache line because free pointer is in the middle of object or
out of object area. my mistake.

> >> Use prefetchw instead of prefetchw. On supported architecture
> >
> > If we're using prefetchw instead of prefetchw, I think the diff would be
> > 0 lines changed :)
> >
> >> like x86, it helps to invalidate cache line when the object exists
> >> in other processors' cache.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/slub.c | 7 +++----
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> >> index 3d2025f7163b..2aca7523165e 100644
> >> --- a/mm/slub.c
> >> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> >> @@ -352,9 +352,9 @@ static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> >> return freelist_dereference(s, object + s->offset);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void prefetch_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> >> +static void prefetchw_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
>
> I wouldn't rename the function itself, unless we have both variants for
> different situations (we don't). That it uses prefetchw() is internal detail
> at this point.

looks good. that is simpler.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-11 15:55    [W:0.048 / U:1.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site