lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC v2] mt76: mt7615: mt7622: fix ibss and meshpoint
From
My tests on todays OpenWrt Trunk with my and without my patch showed:
- MT7622: AP + AdHoc (only AP is working, in every case)
- BPI-MT7615: AP + AdHoc (with and without my patch still works).

I thought something would change if I apply my patch with the
HW-Addresses. However everything stays the same:

With my patch:
AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)
AP: address: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)

Without my patch:
AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)
AP: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)

Bests
Nick

On 10/9/21 15:22, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Nick wrote:
>> On 10/9/21 10:32, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>>> Nick Hainke <vincent@systemli.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Fixes: d8d59f66d136 ("mt76: mt7615: support 16 interfaces").
>>> The fixes tag should be in the end, before Signed-off-by tags. But I can
>>> fix that during commit.
>> Thanks for feedback. Already changed that locally but I did not want to spam
>> you with another RFC v3. :)
>> I was able to organize me a BPI-MT7615 PCIE Express Card. With and without
>> this patch beacons were sent on the mt7615 pcie, so the patch did not make
>> any difference. However, the mt7622 wifi will only work with my patch.
> Does Mesh+AP or Ad-Hoc+AP also work on MT7622 and does it still work on
> MT7615E card with your patch applied?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-11 11:12    [W:0.126 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site