lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: fix idling of devices during probe
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:01 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> * Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> [201204 16:43]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Fixes: 21b2cec61c04 ("mmc: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in v4.4")
> > > >
> > > > From the description it sounds like this problem has always existed
> > > > but the async probe just tickled it reliably. Seems like it'd make
> > > > sense to tag the "Fixes" as some earlier commit so you make sure your
> > > > fix gets picked to kernels even if they don't have the async probe
> > > > patch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, maybe
> > > Fixes: 04abaf07f6d5 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and
> > > pm_runtime after probe defer")
> > >
> > > But on the other hand to stable branches only such patches are applied
> > > which solve pratical problems not only theoretical problems. But maybe
> > > it solves several random issues where nobody took care to debug them.
> > >
> > > That would be since v4.11.
> >
> > I guess maybe best is to include both. Then if someone is debugging
> > why their async probe is failing they will notice this commit, but
> > they also might decide to pick it earlier just to be safe...
>
> OK I'll add the above fixes tag too and apply this into fixes.
>

It might be too late, but...

Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> #logicpd-torpedo-37xx-devkit

> Thanks,
>
> Tony

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-08 20:19    [W:0.065 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site