Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller | From | Lokesh Vutla <> | Date | Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:35:46 +0530 |
| |
Hi Rob, Grygorii,
On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>>> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers. >>>>>> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes >>>>>> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes). >>>>>> and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was >>>>> looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this >>>>> topic. >>>>
Is there a conclusion on this topic? Without adding address-cells for interrupt controller we will be introducing new warning for all the new nodes we are adding.
Thanks and regards, Lokesh
| |