Messages in this thread | | | From | Muchun Song <> | Date | Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:11:41 +0800 | Subject | Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: hugetlb: add return -EAGAIN for dissolve_free_huge_page |
| |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:07 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote: > > On Wed 06-01-21 16:47:37, Muchun Song wrote: > > When dissolve_free_huge_page() races with __free_huge_page(), we can > > do a retry. Because the race window is small. > > Is this a bug fix or mere optimization. I have hard time to tell from > the description.
It is optimization. Thanks.
> > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> > > --- > > mm/hugetlb.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > [...] > > @@ -1825,6 +1828,14 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page) > > } > > out: > > spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock); > > + > > + /* > > + * If the freeing of the HugeTLB page is put on a work queue, we should > > + * flush the work before retrying. > > + */ > > + if (unlikely(rc == -EAGAIN)) > > + flush_work(&free_hpage_work); > > Is it safe to wait for the work to finish from this context?
Yes. It is safe.
> > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs
| |