lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
From
Date
On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>> reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>> to reset/next.
>> -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>> to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>
>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>> reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>> to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>> -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>> to keep things simple.
>>
>> v1 -- original
>>
>>
>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
>> found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git
>> branch reset/shared-retrigger
>
> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
>
> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree
> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on
> these platforms.

Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-05 22:24    [W:0.260 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site