lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] bits_per_long.h: introduce SMALL_CONST() macro
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:49 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Many algorithms become simplier if they are passed with relatively small
>
> simpler
>
> > input values. One example is bitmap operations when the whole bitmap fits
> > into one word. To implement such simplifications, linux/bitmap.h declares
> > small_const_nbits() macro.
> >
> > Other subsystems may also benefit from optimizations of this sort, like
> > find_bit API in the following patches. So it looks helpful to generalize
> > the macro and extend it's visibility.
>
> > It should probably go to linux/kernel.h, but doing that creates circular
> > dependencies. So put it in asm-generic/bitsperlong.h.
>
> No, no, please leave kernel.h alone. It's already quite a mess.
>
> And this shouldn't be in the commit message either.
>
> ...
>
> > - if (small_const_nbits(nbits))
> > + if (SMALL_CONST(nbits - 1))
>
> Not sure if we need to rename it.

Lower case for generic macro kind of breaking the rules.

Behaviour has changed too. Before it was:
0 < VAL <= 32
Now it's
0 <= VAL < 32
Which is better for generic macro.

So changing the name looks reasonable to me.

> ...
>
> > --- a/include/linux/bits.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bits.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> > #define GENMASK(h, l) \
> > (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
> >
> > -#define BITS_FIRST(nr) GENMASK(nr), 0)
> > +#define BITS_FIRST(nr) GENMASK((nr), 0)
>
> How come?!

git send-email wrong_dir/000*
Will resubmit today later.

> ...
>
> > diff --git a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> > index 8f2283052333..432d272baf27 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
>
> I think a tools update would be better to have in a separate patch.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-29 22:31    [W:0.070 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site