lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power
From
Date


On 1/27/21 9:15 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
>> be addressed if all agree.
>
> Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
> is already there. Look for these.
>
> store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
> store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);
>
> Hopefully they will work just fine.
>

So, can I assume you don't mind to plumb it into these two?

Yes, I know them and the tricky macro. I just wanted to avoid
one patch for this macro and one patch for cpufreq_cooling.c,
which would use it.

If you agree and Chanwoo agrees for the devfreq, and Daniel
for the new callback in cooling device, then I would continue
by adding missing patches for cpufreq-cooling part.

Regards,
Lukasz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-27 11:17    [W:0.189 / U:1.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site