Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCHv3 1/6] firmware: stratix10-svc: add COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM flag | From | Richard Gong <> | Date | Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:16:43 -0600 |
| |
Hi Tom,
On 1/25/21 4:56 PM, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 1/25/21 12:56 PM, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> >> Add COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM command flag for new added bitstream >> authentication feature. Authenticating a bitstream is to make sure a signed >> bitstream has the valid signatures. >> >> Except for the actual configuration of the device, the bitstream >> authentication works the same way as FPGA configuration does. If the >> authentication passes, the signed bitstream will be programmed into QSPI >> flash memory and will be expected to boot without issues. >> >> Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which >> aligns with the firmware settings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> --- >> v3: no change >> v2: new added >> --- >> include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h | 11 ++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h b/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h >> index ebc2956..7ada1f2 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h >> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h >> @@ -51,12 +51,17 @@ >> #define SVC_STATUS_NO_SUPPORT 6 >> >> /* > > This patch fails to apply, i believe the conflict is because in mainline this is '/**' not '/*' > > Please check or point me at the branch/tag you are using. >
I am using next-20210125 tag.
> I am using char-misc-next. > > Tom > > Tom > Regards, Richard
| |