lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/qxl: unpin release objects
> > Just calling ttm_bo_unpin() here makes lockdep unhappy.
>
> How does that one splat? But yeah if that's a problem should be
> explained in the comment. I'd then also only do a pin_count--; to make
> sure you can still catch other pin leaks if you have them. Setting it
> to 0 kinda defeats the warning.

Figured the unpin is at the completely wrong place while trying to
reproduce the lockdep splat ...

take care,
Gerd

From 43befab4a935114e8620af62781666fa81288255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:10:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/qxl: unpin release objects

Balances the qxl_create_bo(..., pinned=true, ...);
call in qxl_release_bo_alloc().

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c
index c52412724c26..28013fd1f8ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ int qxl_alloc_release_reserved(struct qxl_device *qdev, unsigned long size,

mutex_lock(&qdev->release_mutex);
if (qdev->current_release_bo_offset[cur_idx] + 1 >= releases_per_bo[cur_idx]) {
+ qxl_bo_unpin(qdev->current_release_bo[cur_idx]);
qxl_bo_unref(&qdev->current_release_bo[cur_idx]);
qdev->current_release_bo_offset[cur_idx] = 0;
qdev->current_release_bo[cur_idx] = NULL;
--
2.29.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-26 06:49    [W:0.035 / U:22.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site