Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:36:49 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after unistd cleanup |
| |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:17:14PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:54:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to > > > > use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks. > > > > > > Makes sense. I was wondering, should we mark them for stable ? I don't > > > know if anyone relies on these tests to validate stable kernels in > > > fact. > > > > I added Fixes tags that should make this happen, and they are now visible > > at -rcu branch "dev". Could you please check them for me? > > I've just rerun all previous tests from my history and all of them are > OK. Please note however that I only did the manual build test, not through > the whole kvm.sh script, but a diff shows that the involved files are byte > for byte identical to those that Valentin and Mark tested, so for me that's > OK as well.
Byte-for-byte identical works for me, thank you!
> By the way, thank you for having completed the commit messages, I hope you > didn't spend too much time on this.
Not a problem! I definitely had the easy end of this job. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
| |