Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:22:42 +0530 | From | Manivannan Sadhasivam <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] mhi: use irq_flags if controller driver configures it |
| |
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:40:19AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:11:28PM +0800, Carl Huang wrote: > >> If controller driver has specified the irq_flags, mhi uses this specified > >> irq_flags. Otherwise, mhi uses default irq_flags. > >> > >> The purpose of this change is to support one MSI vector for QCA6390. > >> MHI will use one same MSI vector too in this scenario. > >> > >> In case of one MSI vector, IRQ_NO_BALANCING is needed when irq handler > >> is requested. The reason is if irq migration happens, the msi_data may > >> change too. However, the msi_data is already programmed to QCA6390 > >> hardware during initialization phase. This msi_data inconsistence will > >> result in crash in kernel. > >> > >> Another issue is in case of one MSI vector, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will trigger > >> WARNINGS because QCA6390 wants to disable the IRQ during the suspend. > >> > >> To avoid above two issues, QCA6390 driver specifies the irq_flags in case > >> of one MSI vector when mhi_register_controller is called. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Carl Huang <cjhuang@codeaurora.org> > >> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > > > > Applied to mhi-next! > > Would it be possible again to have an immutable branch for this commit? > We need it for implementing one MHI support to ath11k[1] required by > Dell XPS 13 9310 laptops, which a lot of people are waiting. Otherwise I > can only apply the feature for v5.13, which will be released on July. >
Dropped this patch from mhi-next and applied to mhi-ath11k-immutable branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/mhi.git/log/?h=mhi-ath11k-immutable
This branch will also be merged into mhi-next.
Thanks, Mani
| |