| From | Jürgen Groß <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] static_call: Pull some static_call declarations to the type headers | Date | Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:46:50 +0100 |
| |
On 18.01.21 15:12, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > Some static call declarations are going to be needed on low level header > files. Move the necessary material to the dedicated static call types > header to avoid inclusion dependency hell. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Could the patches please be reordered to have this one first in the series? I could make use of it in my paravirt simplification series.
I'll include this patch (in slightly modified form. i.e. without the __static_call_return0() parts) in my series in order to make it build.
My tests suggest you should also update tools/include/linux/static_call_types.h
Juergen [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-keys][unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |