lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 3/8] static_call: Pull some static_call declarations to the type headers
Date
On 18.01.21 15:12, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> Some static call declarations are going to be needed on low level header
> files. Move the necessary material to the dedicated static call types
> header to avoid inclusion dependency hell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Could the patches please be reordered to have this one first in the
series? I could make use of it in my paravirt simplification series.

I'll include this patch (in slightly modified form. i.e. without the
__static_call_return0() parts) in my series in order to make it
build.

My tests suggest you should also update
tools/include/linux/static_call_types.h


Juergen
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-keys][unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-19 14:12    [W:0.254 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site