lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 06:23:19PM +0800, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
>
> For now, sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default are globally
> unified. It's not convenient in some case. For example, when we
> use docker and try to control the default udp socket receive buffer
> for each container.
>
> For that reason, make sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default
> per-namespace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
> ---

Hey Menglong,

I was about to review the two patches you sent:

1. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_rmem_max and sysctl_wmem_max
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117104743.217194-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn
2. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117102319.193756-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn

and I had to spend some time figuring out that 2. is dependent on 1. I
first thought I got the base wrong.

I'd suggest you resend both patches as a part of a single series with a
cover letter mentioning the goal and use-case for these changes and also
pass --base=<base-commit>
when creating the patch series which makes it way easier to figure out
what to apply it to when wanting to review a series in the larger
context of a tree.

Thanks!
Christian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-18 12:23    [W:0.041 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site