Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:41:47 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] opp: Filter out OPPs based on availability of a required-OPP |
| |
On 18-01-21, 03:55, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > A required OPP may not be available, and thus, all OPPs which are using > this required OPP should be unavailable too. > > Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/opp/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c > index 48618ff3e99e..7b4d07279638 100644 > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c > @@ -1522,6 +1522,7 @@ int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp, > struct opp_table *opp_table, bool rate_not_available) > { > struct list_head *head; > + unsigned int i; > int ret; > > mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock); > @@ -1547,6 +1548,16 @@ int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp, > __func__, new_opp->rate); > } > > + for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > + if (new_opp->required_opps[i]->available) > + continue; > + > + new_opp->available = false; > + dev_warn(dev, "%s: OPP not supported by required OPP %pOF (%lu)\n", > + __func__, new_opp->required_opps[i]->np, new_opp->rate); > + break; > + } > + > return 0; > }
Applied. Thanks.
Though I am concerned about who will enable this back again if the required-opp comes back. And I am not sure if we should even care about that.
-- viresh
| |