Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:28:22 +0000 | From | Will Deacon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: add missed kernel-doc markup |
| |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:58:11PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > To fix the following issues: > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member > 'lock' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock' > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member > 'wake_q' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock' > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member > 'name' not described in '__rt_mutex_init' > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member > 'key' not described in '__rt_mutex_init' > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > index cfdd5b93264d..50fa521fe767 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > @@ -1604,8 +1604,11 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock); > > /** > - * Futex variant, that since futex variants do not use the fast-path, can be > - * simple and will not need to retry. > + * __rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant, that since futex variants > + * do not use the fast-path, can be simple and will not need to retry. > + * > + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked > + * @wake_q: wake queue head from which get the next lock waiter
missing word: from which *to* get
With that fixed,
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
|  |