Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuset: fix typos in comments | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Date | Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:33:54 -0800 |
| |
On 1/12/21 8:37 PM, Aubrey Li wrote: > Change hierachy to hierarchy and congifured to configured, no functionality > changed. > > Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Thanks.
> --- > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > index 57b5b5d..15f4300 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cpuset { > * and if it ends up empty, it will inherit the parent's mask. > * > * > - * On legacy hierachy: > + * On legacy hierarchy: > * > * The user-configured masks are always the same with effective masks. > */ > @@ -1286,10 +1286,10 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset, int cmd, > * @cs: the cpuset to consider > * @tmp: temp variables for calculating effective_cpus & partition setup > * > - * When congifured cpumask is changed, the effective cpumasks of this cpuset > + * When configured cpumask is changed, the effective cpumasks of this cpuset > * and all its descendants need to be updated. > * > - * On legacy hierachy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed. > + * On legacy hierarchy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed. > * > * Called with cpuset_mutex held > */ >
-- ~Randy You can't do anything without having to do something else first. -- Belefant's Law
| |