Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:38:57 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 | From | Palmer Dabbelt <> |
| |
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:55:15 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:29PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>> >>> The first four patches are general improvements and enablement for all nommu >>> ports, and might make sense to merge through the above base branch. >> >> Seems like it to me. These won't work without the SET_FS code so I'm OK if you >> guys want to keep them all together. Otherwise I think I'd need to wait until >> the SET_FS stuff gets merged before taking any of these, which would be a bit >> of a headache. > > now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not > be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic > branch. > > The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you > re-review the updated patches?
OK, assuming the first four land through vfs I'll take the rest through my tree. I wasn't sure it was OK to merge another subtree into my tree, as IIRC I got told not to do something like that before, but I'll go figure out a sane way to handle it.
Thanks!
| |