Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips | From | Florian Fainelli <> | Date | Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:29:06 -0700 |
| |
On 9/7/2020 10:43 AM, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi > <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Patchset Summary: >>>>>> Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design >>>>>> we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role >>>>>> allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. >>>>> >>>>> We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is >>>>> any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the >>>>> 5.10 merge window. >>>>> >>>>> There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the >>>>> ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion? >>>> >>>> FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. >>>> I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that >>>> apply the current version. >>> Sounds good to me. >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as >> is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ? > Hello Lorenzo, > > We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on > the RaspberryPi. Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now > devising a solution.
Maybe we can parallelize the PCIe driver review while the DMA changes are being worked on in Christoph's branch. Lorenzo, are you fine with the PCIe changes proper? -- Florian
| |