lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/5] ASoC: qcom: Add support for lpass hdmi driver
From
Date
Thanks Stephen for your time for review!!!

On 9/1/2020 1:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2020-08-30 23:39:22)
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-hdmi.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-hdmi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7e18113
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-hdmi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,684 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> [...]
>> +
>> +static int lpass_hdmi_daiops_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
> [...]
>> + data_format = LPASS_DATA_FORMAT_LINEAR;
>> + ch_sts_buf0 = (((data_format << LPASS_DATA_FORMAT_SHIFT) & LPASS_DATA_FORMAT_MASK)
>> + | ((sampling_freq << LPASS_FREQ_BIT_SHIFT) & LPASS_FREQ_BIT_MASK));
>> + ch_sts_buf1 = (word_length) & LPASS_WORDLENGTH_MASK;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(drvdata->tx_ctl->soft_reset, LPASS_TX_CTL_RESET);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dai->dev, "%s error writing to softreset enable : %d\n",
> All of these strings bloat the kernel image. Can we just return ret
> instead and if something goes wrong we can use a debug patch to figure
> out which register write failed? Would a register write even fail to
> begin with?
Will remove wherever possible.
>
>> + __func__, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(drvdata->tx_ctl->soft_reset, LPASS_TX_CTL_CLEAR);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dai->dev, "%s error writing to softreset disable : %d\n",
>> + __func__, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(drvdata->legacy->legacy_en,
>> + LPASS_HDMITX_LEGACY_DISABLE);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dai->dev, "%s error writing to legacy_en field : %d\n",
>> + __func__, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
> [...]
>> #define LPAIF_DMACTL_REG(v, chan, dir) __LPAIF_DMA_REG(v, chan, dir, CTL)
>> #define LPAIF_DMABASE_REG(v, chan, dir) __LPAIF_DMA_REG(v, chan, dir, BASE)
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> index df692ed..607f4c4 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> @@ -553,7 +702,21 @@ static irqreturn_t lpass_platform_lpaif_irq(int irq, void *data)
>>
>> /* Handle per channel interrupts */
>> for (chan = 0; chan < LPASS_MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; chan++) {
>> - if (irqs & LPAIF_IRQ_ALL(chan) && drvdata->substream[chan]) {
>> + switch (v->id) {
>> + case HDMI_INTERFACE:
>> + val = LPAIF_IRQ_HDMI_REQ_ON_PRELOAD(chan) |
>> + LPAIF_IRQ_HDMI_METADONE |
>> + LPAIF_IRQ_HDMI_SDEEP_AUD_DIS(chan);
>> + break;
>> + case I2S_INTERFACE:
>> + val = 0;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + pr_err("%s: invalid %d interface\n", __func__, v->id);
> Any reason we can't use dev_err() here?

It's interrupt handler. Here dev variable is not available.

So we shall remove print as per your previous comment or keep as it is.

>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + if (irqs & (LPAIF_IRQ_ALL(chan) | val)
>> + && drvdata->substream[chan]) {
>> rv = lpass_dma_interrupt_handler(
>> drvdata->substream[chan],
>> drvdata, chan, irqs);
>> @@ -644,15 +807,15 @@ int asoc_qcom_lpass_platform_register(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> /* ensure audio hardware is disabled */
>> ret = regmap_write(drvdata->lpaif_map,
>> - LPAIF_IRQEN_REG(v, LPAIF_IRQ_PORT_HOST), 0);
>> + IRQ_EN(v, LPAIF_IRQ_PORT_HOST), 0);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error writing to irqen reg: %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, drvdata->lpaif_irq,
>> - lpass_platform_lpaif_irq, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
>> - "lpass-irq-lpaif", drvdata);
>> + lpass_platform_lpaif_irq, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> Can we use the irq flags from the firmware, i.e. whatever the DT or ACPI
> tables say?
okay.
>
>> + pdev->name, drvdata);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq request failed: %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;

--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-03 11:30    [W:0.129 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site