lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations
From
Date
Le 10/09/2020 à 09:23, Michal Hocko a écrit :
> On Wed 09-09-20 18:07:15, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> Le 09/09/2020 à 12:59, Michal Hocko a écrit :
>>> On Wed 09-09-20 11:21:58, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> [...]
>>>> For the point a, using the enum allows to know in
>>>> register_mem_sect_under_node() if the link operation is due to a hotplug
>>>> operation or done at boot time.
>>>
>>> Yes, but let me repeat. We have a mess here and different paths check
>>> for the very same condition by different ways. We need to unify those.
>>
>> What are you suggesting to unify these checks (using a MP_* enum as
>> suggested by David, something else)?
>
> We do have system_state check spread at different places. I would use
> this one and wrap it behind a helper. Or have I missed any reason why
> that wouldn't work for this case?

That would not work in that case because memory can be hot-added at the
SYSTEM_SCHEDULING system state and the regular memory is also registered at that
system state too. So system state is not enough to discriminate between the both.

I think I'll go with the option suggested by David, replacing the enum
memmap_context a new enum memplug_context and pass that context to
register_mem_sect_under_node() so that function will known when node id should
be checked or not.

Cheers,
Laurent.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-10 09:52    [W:0.123 / U:0.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site