Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:37:31 +0100 | From | Sudeep Holla <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq statistics retrieved by drivers |
| |
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 8/5/2020 9:03 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 06:34:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> On 05-08-20, 12:04, Lukasz Luba wrote: > >>> I know that Viresh is going to develop patches and improve these > >>> cpufreq stats framework. Maybe he also had this 'aggregation' in mind. > >>> I will leave it him. > >> > >> I am only going to look at cpufreq's view of stats independently from > >> the firmware. > >> > > > > +1, I agree with that. Kernel must avoid any logic to aggregate or > > interpret the data in a generic way. The userspace tools can manage that > > especially if this tend to be platform specific. > > We can probably standardize on how to expose the firmware maintained > statistics such that these tools do not have to widely vary from > platform to platform, right?
Ofcourse. I just don't want any logic that interpret/analyse the stats comparing with the in-kernel stats or otherwise.
-- Regards, Sudeep
| |