lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v17 20/21] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru_lock
From
Date


在 2020/8/4 上午6:45, Alexander Duyck 写道:
> Just to correct a typo, I meant patch 17, not 18. in the comment below.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:42 PM Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 6:00 AM Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now pgdat.lru_lock was replaced by lruvec lock. It's not used anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
>>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> I really think this would be better just squashed into patch 18
>> instead of as a standalone patch since you were moving all of the
>> locking anyway so it would be more likely to trigger build errors if
>> somebody didn't move a lock somewhere that was referencing this.

Thanks for comments!
If someone changed the lru_lock between patch 17 and this, it would cause
more troubles then build error here. :) so don't warries for that.
But on the other side, I am so insist to have a ceremony to remove this lock...

>>
>> That said this change is harmless at this point.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>

Thanks a lot for review!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-04 08:23    [W:0.068 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site