lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices
From
Date


On 8/28/20 4:13 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:24:07 -0400
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 8/25/20 6:13 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:56:02 -0400
>>> Tony Krowiak<akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> /**
>>>> - * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from a list
>>>> - * @matrix_mdev: the associated mediated matrix
>>>> + * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN.
>>>> * @apqn: The queue APQN
>>>> *
>>>> - * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the list of the
>>>> - * devices of the vfio_ap_drv.
>>>> - * Verify that the APID and the APQI are set in the matrix.
>>>> + * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the AP queue devices attached to
>>>> + * the AP bus.
>>>> *
>>>> - * Returns the pointer to the associated vfio_ap_queue
>>>> + * Returns the pointer to the vfio_ap_queue with the specified APQN, or NULL.
>>>> */
>>>> -static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(
>>>> - struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
>>>> - int apqn)
>>>> +static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct ap_queue *queue;
>>>> struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
>>>> - struct device *dev;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_CARD(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.apm))
>>>> - return NULL;
>>>> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_QUEUE(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm))
>>> I think you should add some explanation to the patch description why
>>> testing the matrix bitmasks is not needed anymore.
>> As a result of this comment, I took a closer look at the code to
>> determine the reason for eliminating the matrix_mdev
>> parameter. The reason is because the code below (i.e., find the device
>> and get the driver data) was also repeated in the vfio_ap_irq_disable_apqn()
>> function, so I replaced it with a call to the function above; however, the
>> vfio_ap_irq_disable_apqn() function  does not have a reference to the
>> matrix_mdev, so I eliminated the matrix_mdev parameter. Note that the
>> vfio_ap_irq_disable_apqn() is called for each APQN assigned to a matrix
>> mdev, so there is no need to test the bitmasks there.
>>
>> The other place from which the function above is called is
>> the handle_pqap() function which does have a reference to the
>> matrix_mdev. In order to ensure the integrity of the instruction
>> being intercepted - i.e., PQAP(AQIC) enable/disable IRQ for aN
>> AP queue - the testing of the matrix bitmasks probably ought to
>> be performed, so it will be done there instead of in the
>> vfio_ap_get_queue() function above.
> Should you add a comment that vfio_ap_get_queue() assumes that the
> caller makes sure that this is only called for APQNs that are assigned
> to a matrix?

I suppose it wouldn't hurt.

>
>>
>>> + queue = ap_get_qdev(apqn);
>>> + if (!queue)
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> - dev = driver_find_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL,
>>> - &apqn, match_apqn);
>>> - if (!dev)
>>> - return NULL;
>>> - q = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> - q->matrix_mdev = matrix_mdev;
>>> - put_device(dev);
>>> + q = dev_get_drvdata(&queue->ap_dev.device);
>>> + put_device(&queue->ap_dev.device);
>>>
>>> return q;
>>> }
>>> (...)
>>>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-28 17:11    [W:0.312 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site